Metal v Nature, hail, RICOWI

Metal v Nature, hail, RICOWI

Roofing battles Mother Nature’s most physical and visual weapon  /

Metal roofing stands up to the forces of nature as well as or better than any type of roofing material and you should know how to sell that benefit to your customers. This is the second in a six-part series on how metal roofing holds up against Mother Nature. Each part will focus on a different phenomenon. For this issue it’s metal vs. hail.

RICOWI photo

When it comes to roofing, Mother Nature doesn’t play favorites when she unleashes hail.

Most areas of the United States are subject to hail, but year in and year out, the most consistently brutal hailstorms hit the south central part of the country — Texas and surrounding states.

The Roofing Industry Committee on Weather Issues Inc. has established two programs:

  •   Wind Investigation Program
  •   Hail Investigation Program

According to the RICOWI website, the purpose of these programs is to “investigate the field performances of roofing assemblies after major hurricane and hailstorm events; factually describe roof assembly performance and modes of damage; and formally report the results for sustained hurricane / hail events.”

RICOWI has two hail reports available on its website, one from a 2011 event in Texas and another from a 2004 hailstorm in Oklahoma City.

What follows are the report on metal roofing during those storms.

From RICOWI report in 2011 (Texas)

Sixteen roofs were inspected with metal roofing; the types of roofing included raised rib metal panels, standing-seam metal panels, metal shingle panels, including stone-coated steel panels. In all cases the roof pitch was 3:12 or steeper, although the painted and Galvalume-coated raised rib panels were on commercial buildings or schools. Other materials included standing-seam copper on two locations, galvanized steel and standing seam painted steel. Four roofs with stone-coated steel panels had UL 2218 Class 4 IR rating.

RICOWI photo

“Most of the metal inspection sites were in the city of Irving where some of the largest hail fell, with maximum hailstone sizes listed as 1.5 to 4.0 inches in diameter. Nine sites were listed as damage categories 0 or 1, having no visible dents or a small number of shallow depth dents. Some of the stone-coated panels on steep slopes (12:12 pitch) sustained hailstones up to 2.5 inches without visible dents or spalling of the granule surfacing. Otherwise, the sites were listed as damage category 4 as having moderate to severe denting. No fractures or punctures occurred in the metal panels, with no evidence of leakage found or reported below the metal roofing at these sites.

One site with severely dented metal shingles from 2.5-inch hail had some distorted side laps. Raised rib panels had denting of ribs and pans areas, but no open seams were noted. No fracturing or spalling of painted coatings was found at hail impact marks. One of the stone-coated steel panels struck with 2.5-inch hail had spalling of the stone coating at a few locations.

Metal v Nature, hail, RICOWI

The RICOWI hail investigations obtained a considerable amount of beneficial data for all parties interested in the effects of hail impact on roofing products. It was the second large-scale hailstorm investigation by balanced teams representing roof manufacturers, roofing industry trade associations, roof consultants, researchers and engineers and the insurance industry. The HIP investigations provided field data related to scientifically estimated hailstone sizes that supported previous laboratory testing and field experience reported in several referenced documents. The joint inspections by the balanced teams resulted in consensus data gathered from the inspection sites.

“The inspection teams were able to investigate a number of roofs that had been impacted by a recent significant hailstorm, factually describe roof performance and modes of damage, and correlate the damage with hailstone size(s) and quantities. Data was gathered that can be used in improving evaluation of hail-impacted roofing and improving design of roofing systems to resist hail impact damage.

“In reviewing the overall results, the following findings emerged:

“Hail-caused damage, if it occurred, was readily apparent to the trained eye in most cases. Circumstances where further sampling could be appropriate included low slope roofing material that incorporated laminated plies of materials, such as modified bitumen membranes, built-up roofing, and some thermoplastic membranes.

The effects of hail impact were distinguishable from normal weathering. Impact-caused fractures in materials had appearances that were distinct from cracking or other indications of long-term weathering. Impact generally resulted in circular starburst-shaped fractures, and the fracture surfaces had limited oxidation, shrinkage, or grime accumulation, and there was often direct surface evidence of the hail impact. Examples included asphaltic materials that appeared dark black-colored with coincident indentation or fracturing, fresh splits in cedar appeared bright orange-colored with associated impact dent, and clean fracture surfaces with multiple fractures on concrete and clay tiles.

Hailstone size (and resultant impact energy) was more critical than hailstone quantity in determining if the roofing was damaged. Areas with the large quantities of hail did not sustain roofing damage if the maximum hailstone size at that site did not exceed that necessary threshold of damage for that material. Almost no damage was found in areas where the maximum hailstone size was less than 1.0 inch in diameter, with the exception of badly deteriorated and unsupported material. When maximum hailstone size was between 1.0 and 2.0 inches in diameter, the level of damage ranged from none to considerable depending on material, age/condition, roof slope, and support conditions. When maximum hailstone size was greater than 2.0 inches in diameter, most roofing material sustained damage or denting of metal.

The IR rated asphalt shingle products performed better than the standard asphalt shingles. The average damage category rating for standard asphalt shingles was 2.5 with IR asphalt shingles was 1.3. This indicated the IR shingles were more likely to have no apparent physical damage or damage with low quantity or low severity.

Standard asphalt shingles generally sustained moderate or severe damage when hailstone sizes were 1.25 inches in diameter or larger. The IR rated shingles generally performed to their Class 3 or 4 ratings with only one roof having moderate damage when struck with hailstones less than 2.0 inches in diameter (1.75 inches in that case).

The teams observed that the threshold for roof damage from hailstone impact to most materials was between 1.25 and 2.0 inches, which correlates with the size ranges used in most standard impact resistance tests used to simulate the effects of hail impact, including UL 2218, FM 4473, and FM 4470 (often used for low-slope roofing products). This field investigation suggests this is an appropriate range as roofing material performance varied with hailstone impacts of this size range. No attempts were made to compare various test methods. An exception to damage occurring by 2.0 inch diameter hail was metal roofing panels that would sustain denting, but retain water-shedding integrity even up to 2.5 inch diameter hail in most cases.

Materials that were unsupported or over easily compressible substrates had greater damage than those over more solid substrate. This was demonstrated where certain high profile asphalt shingle ridge units that had unsupported regions, in unsupported valley areas for asphalt shingles, and low slope roofing unsupported transition areas at base flashings and membrane that was installed over compressible insulation boards.

Some materials displayed reduced hail impact resistance, particularly those over 10 years old, with respect to age and deterioration. Categories included asphaltic products (including modified bitumens), and cedar shingles and shakes.

Hail effects on metal roof systems were seen as largely cosmetic, rather than functional. Indentations occurred with larger hailstones, but painted coatings had not been visibly compromised by the denting. Most of the metal roof systems inspected had greater than maximum hailstone size of 2.5 inches in diameter, and no leakage was observed or reported even with the moderate to severe denting. With the extremely large hail there were a few instances of distorted seams or spalled granule surfacing, but even this was rare. Metal roofing products with Class 4 rating performed as designed with no fractures or open seams found with 2.0-inch diameter or smaller hail.

Bottom line: know your products and their warranties, which are great selling points to your customers.


Leave a Reply